
EOSEEos Energy Enterprises, Inc.
Industry Energy storage Updated 28 Sep 2026 Price 23 Oct 2026
If management hits its targets, one share in 12 months
Held at $1.73
Promises vs. what happened
15 claims · 8 decksEvery target management put in a slide deck, and whether they hit it, missed it, or quietly dropped it.
| Promise | Made in | What happened | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY24 revenue about $15M, after the Nov '24 cut | Q3 '24 | $15.6M | Held |
| FY26 revenue $300-400M | Q4 '25 | cut to the lower half of $300-350M; 9 months about $208M | Late |
| Sub-assembly automation, 4.8x throughput, 2H '25 | Q2 '25 | done; 4.8x never shown | Late |
| Backlog to roughly double from 2.3 GWh | Q3 '24 | 3.4 GWh in Q2, half the JV; 3.2 GWh in Q3 | Late |
| Contribution margin positive by end '24 | Q3 '24 | never reported again | Dropped |
| Project AMAZE, 8 GWh a year | Q4 '24 | dropped; one plant of about 4 GWh | Dropped |
| The DOE loan funds the expansion | Q3 '24 | dropped; stock and converts did, $87M more drawn Q3 '26 | Dropped |
| 5.4 GWh of MOUs, 5 GWh in the UK | Q1 '25 | no UK order reported | Dropped |
| Line 2 producing by mid-'26, full in Q4 '26 | Q3 '25 | started; ~17% of Q3 output, partial shift | Open |
| Positive adjusted gross profit exit rate, Q4 '26 | Q2 '26 | open; -62% in Q2, GAAP about -54% in Q3 | Open |
| Joint venture's first projects online, Q3 '27 | Q2 '26 | open | Open |
| FY25 revenue $150-190M, at least 10x | Q4 '24 | $114.2M, 7.3x | Missed |
| FY25 cut to $150-160M, Nov '25 | Q3 '25 | $114.2M, 24% below the floor | Missed |
| 2 GWh a year of capacity by end '25 | Q4 '24 | ~1.5 GWh run rate, Jun '26 | Missed |
| Enough capital for profitable growth | Q3 '24 | $1.4B raised within a year | Missed |
What they’re pitching
the headline page, deck by deckThe headline from each quarterly results deck over two years, so you can see what they want you to focus on, and when it changes.
'24Q4
'24Q1
'25Q2
'25Q3
'25Q4
'25Q1
'26Q2
'26
PipelinePage one since Q3 '24
Cost-outFirst seen Q3 '24
CapacityOff page one Q3 '25
MarginsOff page one Q2 '26
BankabilityFirst seen Q3 '24
Data centresFirst seen Q1 '25
PolicyFirst seen Q4 '24
FinancingFirst seen Q3 '24
The JVOff page one Q4 '25
on the headline page further in the deck not in the deck▲ onto page one▼ off page one● first mentionTap a mark for the quote.
Pipeline and backlog on the highlights slide
“$14.2 billion”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q3 2024 Financial Results · p. 4 ·
Pipeline and backlog on the highlights slide
“$ 14.4 billion”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q4 2024 Financial Results · p. 4 ·
Pipeline and backlog on the highlights slide
“$ 15.6 billion”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q1 2025 Financial Results · p. 4 ·
Pipeline and backlog on the highlights slide
“$ 18.8 billion”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2025 Financial Results · p. 4 ·
Pipeline and backlog on the highlights slide
“$ 22.6 billion”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q3 2025 Financial Results · p. 4 ·
Pipeline and backlog on the highlights slide
“$ 23.6 billion”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q4 2025 Financial Results · p. 4 ·
Pipeline and backlog on the highlights slide
“$24 billion”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q1 2026 Financial Results · p. 4 ·
Pipeline and backlog on the highlights slide
“$807 million 25% increase from prior quarter”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2026 Financial Results · p. 5 ·
Cost-out and sub-assembly automation
“Delivering on Cost-Out & Optimizing Production Ramp”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q3 2024 Financial Results · p. 7 ·
Cost-out and sub-assembly automation
“Realized 56% cost-out from launch; 77% volume adjusted cost-out”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q4 2024 Financial Results · p. 7 ·
Cost-out and sub-assembly automation
“Subassembly Automation Update”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q1 2025 Financial Results · p. 8 ·
Cost-out and sub-assembly automation
“Sub-Assembly Automation Enabling Scale & Cost-Out”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2025 Financial Results · p. 7 ·
Cost-out and sub-assembly automation
“Removing production bottlenecks”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q3 2025 Financial Results · p. 8 ·
Cost-out and sub-assembly automation
“Operational Scaling Driving Throughput Growth”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q4 2025 Financial Results · p. 7 ·
Cost-out and sub-assembly automation
“Targeted Process Improvement Driving Record Output”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q1 2026 Financial Results · p. 9 ·
Cost-out and sub-assembly automation
“Advancing operations to deliver profitable growth”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2026 Financial Results · p. 9 ·
Capacity expansion (Project AMAZE, Thorn Hill, Line 2)
“Expanding American-Made Energy Storage Capacity”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q4 2024 Financial Results · p. 6 ·
Capacity expansion (Project AMAZE, Thorn Hill, Line 2)
“Line 2 ordered 4”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2025 Financial Results · p. 4 ·
Capacity expansion (Project AMAZE, Thorn Hill, Line 2)
“Line 2 production expected mid 2026”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q3 2025 Financial Results · p. 5 ·
Capacity expansion (Project AMAZE, Thorn Hill, Line 2)
“Building Readiness End of Q1”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q4 2025 Financial Results · p. 7 ·
Capacity expansion (Project AMAZE, Thorn Hill, Line 2)
“Building Readiness Complete”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q1 2026 Financial Results · p. 9 ·
Capacity expansion (Project AMAZE, Thorn Hill, Line 2)
“Mfg. Footprint Potential Consolidation”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2026 Financial Results · p. 9 ·
Margin trajectory and path to profitability
“Positioning For Scale & Profitability”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2025 Financial Results · p. 6 ·
Margin trajectory and path to profitability
“Clear line of sight to profitable growth”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q3 2025 Financial Results · p. 8 ·
Margin trajectory and path to profitability
“Operating leverage beginning to emerge”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q4 2025 Financial Results · p. 6 ·
Margin trajectory and path to profitability
“Gross loss improved by $10m sequentially 17% higher output”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q1 2026 Financial Results · p. 4 ·
Margin trajectory and path to profitability
“Roadmap to Positive Adjusted Gross Margin 72+ pts”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2026 Financial Results · p. 11 ·
Bankability, safety and field performance
“Now quoting RTE in alignment with industry standards 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q3 2024 Financial Results · p. 9 ·
Bankability, safety and field performance
“Launched Full Bankability Offering”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q4 2024 Financial Results · p. 9 ·
Bankability, safety and field performance
“Eos Systems Built for Resiliency”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2025 Financial Results · p. 5 ·
Bankability, safety and field performance
“Eos Z3 Field Performance as of October 28, 2025 3 major utilities actively cycling and 1 Department of Defense site in operation”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q3 2025 Financial Results · p. 7 ·
Bankability, safety and field performance
“delivers improved consistent performance”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q1 2026 Financial Results · p. 8 ·
Bankability, safety and field performance
“Growing the Eos Installed Base 200+ MWh expected to become operational within the next 6 months”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2026 Financial Results · p. 6 ·
Data-center and hyperscaler demand
“Eos Provides Differentiated Performance for Data Centers”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q1 2025 Financial Results · p. 11 ·
Data-center and hyperscaler demand
“Data Center demand adding large project volume to pipeline”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2025 Financial Results · p. 9 ·
Data-center and hyperscaler demand
“Pipeline growth driven by accelerating hyperscaler demand Orders Backlog 1”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q3 2025 Financial Results · p. 10 ·
Data-center and hyperscaler demand
“Growing presence across energy infrastructure & hyperscalers”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q4 2025 Financial Results · p. 9 ·
Data-center and hyperscaler demand
“Data Center related”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2026 Financial Results · p. 7 ·
Policy, tax credits and tariffs
“Short-term regulatory uncertainties”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q4 2024 Financial Results · p. 5 ·
Policy, tax credits and tariffs
“Tariffs exerting upward cost pressure”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q1 2025 Financial Results · p. 5 ·
Policy, tax credits and tariffs
“Preserves Eos PTC; FEOC creates new demand for American – made LDES”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2025 Financial Results · p. 8 ·
Financing and capital structure
“Enhancing Capital Flexibility”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q3 2024 Financial Results · p. 12 ·
Financing and capital structure
“June 2025 Offering Sources and Uses”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2025 Financial Results · p. 11 ·
Financing and capital structure
“November 2025 Offering Sources & Uses”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q4 2025 Financial Results · p. 14 ·
Financing and capital structure
“Overview of a Rights Offering”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q1 2026 Financial Results · p. 7 ·
Frontier Power and FPUSA
“Deploy LDES across the UK & international markets”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q1 2025 Financial Results · p. 10 ·
Frontier Power and FPUSA
“Frontier Power”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q3 2025 Financial Results · p. 4 ·
Frontier Power and FPUSA
“Formation of Frontier Power USA”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q1 2026 Financial Results · p. 5 ·
Frontier Power and FPUSA
“Frontier Power USA: A Long-Term Operating Asset”
Deck Eos Energy Enterprises Q2 2026 Financial Results · p. 8 ·
What they keep talking about · 11
The themes that show up deck after deck, and the ones that disappear.
- Pipeline
- Led every highlights slide from Q3 '24 to Q1 '26 as it grew from $14.2B to $24.6B, while backlog sat at $0.59-0.70B for seven quarters. In Q2 '26 backlog took the lead at $807M — half of it the joint venture — and the Q3 '26 release has it at $765M.
- Cost-out
- In all eight decks. The $/kWh cost-out bars last appear in Q1 '25; later decks give per-cube changes instead.
- Capacity
- Project AMAZE and 8 GWh are last named in Q4 '24. By Q2 '26 the story is moving Line 1 into Thorn Hill, not adding lines; the Q3 '26 release puts the one plant at about 4 GWh a year.
- Margins
- A margin-trend chart in every deck from Q2 '25, and a dated target from Q2 '26 on a new product-only metric.
- Bankability
- Cumulative discharge on the highlights slide; Q1 '26 splits it, showing Z3, today's product, at about 0.5 GWh of the 6+ GWh total.
- Data centres
- First in Q1 '25; Q2 '26 puts it at about 32% of the pipeline. None of the backlog is named as data-centre business.
- Policy
- A full tax-credit slide in Q2 '25 when the law passed; no policy slide after it.
- Financing
- Cerberus and DOE loans in 2024, converts and stock in 2025, then a rights offering to fund the joint venture in 2026.
- The JV
- A 5 GWh UK MOU in Q1 '25 becomes a US joint venture with Cerberus in Q1 '26, holding a 2 GWh capacity reservation; by Q2 '26 it is 49% of backlog.
- New
- Q4 '25: adjusted gross margin. Q2 '26: product adjusted gross profit, a June run rate, and the joint venture's committed capital.
- Quiet
- Contribution margin after Q3 '24, $/kWh cost-out after Q1 '25, dollar bookings and DOE loan draws after Q2 '25, adjusted EPS from Q1 '26.
Every quarterly report we’ve saved · 9
The press releases and shareholder letters behind this page.
- Q3 2026 release · 8-K 19 Oct 2026
- Q2 2026 release · 8-K 15 Jul 2026
- Q1 2026 release · 8-K 9 Apr 2026
- Q4 2025 release · 8-K 26 Feb 2026
- Q3 2025 release · 8-K 5 Nov 2025
- Q2 2025 release · 8-K 30 Jul 2025
- Q1 2025 release · 8-K 6 May 2025
- Q4 2024 release · 8-K 4 Mar 2025
- Q3 2024 release · 8-K 5 Nov 2024
Archived as text; the links open the copies filed on EDGAR or the investor-relations site.
What analysts asked them
8 calls · Q3 24 – Q2 26The last eight earnings calls: what analysts kept asking about, which questions got dodged, and how much the CEO did the talking.
Share of questions by topic, call by call. A topic that suddenly dominates is usually the problem. The last row is how much of the answering the CEO did, rather than the CFO or others.
| Share of questions about… | Q3 24 | Q4 24 | Q1 25 | Q2 25 | Q3 25 | Q4 25 | Q1 26 | Q2 26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demand & customers | 70% | 60% | 16% | 56% | 43% | 27% | 36% | 40% |
| Growth & sales | 30% | 50% | 11% | 56% | 29% | 18% | 9% | 20% |
| Pricing & margins | · | 30% | 16% | 11% | 43% | 27% | 9% | 30% |
| Guidance & outlook | 20% | 20% | 26% | 33% | 14% | 18% | 18% | 20% |
| Capacity & supply | 30% | 40% | 26% | 22% | 14% | 9% | 45% | 50% |
| Capital & financing | 20% | 10% | · | · | 14% | 9% | 36% | · |
| Competition | · | · | · | · | · | 9% | 9% | · |
| Products & technology | 30% | · | 5% | 22% | 14% | 9% | 27% | 10% |
| Macro & regulation | · | 10% | 5% | · | · | · | · | · |
| Other | · | 10% | 47% | 11% | 29% | 36% | · | · |
| Questions | 10 | 10 | 19 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 11 | 10 |
| How much the CEO talked | 69% | 50% | 80% | 28% | 55% | 87% | 76% | 100% |
Who’s in charge, who’s selling
read from the filings · 23 Oct 2026Shareholder votes against the board and pay, plus which executives have been selling their own shares.
Tier 1 · worsening
Cerberus is the lender, a third of the equity, three directors and the controller of the biggest customer
A $201M secured loan, preferred and a penny warrant worth 175.8M shares (32.5% of the economic count), three directors the common holders cannot vote on, advisory fees, and control of Frontier Power USA: $55.0M of Q2 '26's $68.8M of revenue and 49% of backlog. Every raise re-sets Cerberus's conversion terms upward; July's added 16.2M shares.
Tier 1 · worsening
The share count is how the business is paid for
Economic shares 419M to 541M in a little over a year; weighted shares 52.7M in 2021, 260.8M in 2025. The authorisation went from 600M to 800M in June '26. About 39M warrants at $5.481 and $650M of converts sit behind it, and 56.5M shares are on a resale shelf.
Tier 2 · live
A class action and two derivative suits over what was said about manufacturing
Filed March '26 against the company, the CEO and the acting CFO; the derivative suits, naming nine directors, are consolidated and stayed. A short-seller report alleging DOE-loan misuse and cost above price is unanswered in the filings.
Tier 2 · worsening
Four people in the finance seat in eighteen months; chair and legal chief gone too
Kroeker, Javidi, Kroeker again as interim, then Lagi from Jun '26. Kroeker leaves 20 Oct '26 with every unvested RSU accelerated. The chair resigned in Dec '25 three weeks after selling $11.5M of stock.
Tier 2 · stable
No auditor opinion on internal control
A non-accelerated filer needs none. The auditor's two hardest areas are the valuation of the converts, warrants and Cerberus instruments — the marks that turned H1 '26 into a $233M profit.
Where shareholders voted no
At each annual meeting shareholders vote on who sits on the board, what the executives are paid and whether the company may create more shares. These are the votes that drew the most "no"s at the last two meetings: the shares voted against (or withheld) each year, then what share of all votes cast that was. Under each one, what the vote was about and what a no means.
| 2025 | 2026 | Share 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Say on payExecutive pay. Shareholders say whether they accept what the top executives were paid. The vote is advisory: the board can ignore it, but a large no is a public rebuke and boards usually change the pay plan after one. | 7.7M | 43.2M | 24.7% |
| Share plan amendmentStock to pay staff and executives. Lets the company create new shares to hand out as pay. Every new share makes each existing share a slightly smaller slice of the company, so a no says shareholders think the dilution is too much. | 24.5M | 43.9M | 25.2% |
| Demby (director)A board seat. Shareholders vote to keep this person on the board, the group that hires, pays and can fire the CEO. A no, or a withheld vote, says they want this director out, often because of the committee they sit on or a decision they signed off. | — | 40.9M | 23.3% |
| Dimitrief (director)A board seat. | 23.8M | — | 31.4% ('25) |
| Authorised shares to 800MPermission to create more shares. The company may then sell new shares later, for deals or to raise cash. New shares dilute the existing ones, so each shareholder owns a smaller share of the company. A no says shareholders want that door kept narrower. | — | 8.6M | 3.3% |
| Auditor (Deloitte)The auditor. Keeping the outside accounting firm that checks the company's books. This almost always passes; a sizeable no means shareholders doubt the audit or think the firm has been in place too long. | 0.1M | 1.6M | 0.6% |
Insiders who sold the most stock
Reported sales by executives and directors, biggest first.
| Form 4s, Oct 2025-Sep 2026 | Sold | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Stidolph, chair to Dec '25 | $11.5M | 766,134 shares in Dec '25, no plan; resigned that month |
| Kroeker, commercial chief | $1.8M | under a plan; leaves 20 Oct '26 |
| Mastrangelo, CEO | $1.6M | $0.6M outside a plan in Jul '26; bought $0.5M in Mar '26 |
| Walters, director | $1.3M | Dec '25 and May '26, no plan |