The Ledger

GTLBGitLab Inc.

Industry Dev software Updated 28 Sep 2026 Price 23 Oct 2026

If management hits its targets, one share by the end of 2028

$56.28 → $69.95

If management hits its targets

from IR material and Earnings Calls

What one share would be worth today and in 12, 24 and 36 months if the company does exactly what its management has promised, next to what a share costs now. Worked out from the targets management gave in its own results decks and earnings calls.

$56 → $59

One guided year on: +10% a year. 2027 is the year management has guided, and it is still running 12 months from the price date, so the 12-month bar, $58.62, stays at or near today's price: the model counts no growth until a guided year is over and only the share count moves. Carried one year past it on management's own figures, the same ones the 24- and 36-month bars use, a share works out to $69.95 at the end of 2028, 26 months from the price date. Climbing there at an even pace from today's $56.28 is +10% a year, $62.15 in 12 months, and that is the figure the Companies page lists.

Show the math

today's enterprise value over the operating profit management has guided for this year — 53× forward on a guided 13% margin — held flat, times revenue compounding at the rates management puts on its own guides, times that same margin. Then plus net cash of -$1.3B and divided by the share count, 167.3M today, moving at the pace of the last half. Each figure management gave as a range is taken at its middle.

0$20$40$60$80$100Today (Oct 2026): $56, the market price$56TodayOct 202612 months (Oct 2027): $59 a share if management delivers$5912 monthsOct 202724 months (Oct 2028): $68 a share if management delivers$6824 monthsOct 202836 months (Oct 2029): $81 a share if management delivers$8136 monthsOct 2029
SharesTodayIn 12 monthsOct 2027In 24 monthsOct 2028In 36 monthsOct 2029
Past pace: all sharesshares -3.3% a year as in the half to Jul '26, on the first buyback the company has ever run$56$59161M sh$68155M sh$81150M sh
Show the math, step by step

How we got there: company value if the plan is delivered, minus debt, divided by all the shares, including the new ones they’d have to sell to pay for it.

  1. The multiple. 53× is today's enterprise value divided by the $148-152M of non-GAAP operating profit management guides for fiscal 2027. The model holds it, so the value moves only with revenue and margin, and the rerating question is left where it belongs — outside the page.
  2. The years. Fiscal 2028, 2029 and 2030 are not guided. Revenue compounds at 15-19%: the slow end is the growth management prints on the quarter it is guiding next, which is below the quarter just reported, and the fast end is the growth it prints on the full year. The margin is held at the guided 13.1-13.5%. These are GitLab's fiscal years, each ending 31 January.
  3. The shares. 167.3M at 31 Jul 2026, against 170.1M six months earlier: the board authorised $400M in March 2026 and the company retired 5.84M shares at an average $26.47. The arithmetic grows the share count to each calendar year end, eleven months past the fiscal year it is labelled with, so it is eleven months more dilution than the year needs; the bars at 12, 24 and 36 months from the price date are read along the line between those points. Working against it: the equity plan's reserve rises automatically by 5% of the shares every February, 8.5M shares this year, with another 1% for the purchase plan.

Promises vs. what happened

14 claims · 8 decks

Every target management put in a slide deck, and whether they hit it, missed it, or quietly dropped it.

PromiseMade inWhat happened
Q4 FY25 revenue $205-206MQ3 '25$211M, and profit +29%Held
FY25 revenue $753-754MQ3 '25$759M, +31%Held
FY26 revenue $936-942MQ4 '25$955M, and profit $163M vs $109-114MHeld
Margin flat Q1 to Q2 FY26Q4 '2512% to 17%, five points betterHeld
Q2 FY27 revenue $272-274MQ1 '27$286M, the widest beatHeld
Seats for the core, usage for AIQ2 '26Flex launched Q2 FY27Held
New customers, the first objectiveQ4 '251,700 first orders, +100%Held
Duo Workflow, autonomous agentQ3 '25still a modest revenue lineLate
AI raises usage, not cuts seatsQ2 '26usage up; retention 124% to 117%Late
FY27 revenue $1.10-1.12BQ4 '26raised twice, now $1.13BOpen
Q3 FY27 revenue $281-283MQ2 '27open; below Q2's $286MOpen
FY27 gross margin 85-87%Q2 '2786% in Q2, from 91%Open
Paid CRR over $100M by FY27 endQ2 '27$40M at Q2; needs $60M moreOpen
Flex becomes the defaultQ2 '27$20M+ in six weeks; openOpen

What they’re pitching

the headline page, deck by deck

The headline from each quarterly results deck over two years, so you can see what they want you to focus on, and when it changes.

Q3
'25
Q4
'25
Q1
'26
Q2
'26
Q3
'26
Q4
'26
Q1
'27
Q2
'27

LeadershipFirst seen Q3 '25

DuoFirst seen Q3 '25

UltimateFirst seen Q1 '26

The planFirst seen Q4 '25

New customersNew Q4 '25 · Page one since Q2 '27

FlexFirst seen Q2 '26

AI usageFirst seen Q2 '26

SecurityFirst seen Q3 '25

on the headline page further in the deck not in the deck▲ onto page one▼ off page one● first mentionTap a mark for the quote.

Leadership changes on the slides

Q3 '25 · further in the deck

“GitLab CEO and board member”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2025 · p. 4 ·

Leadership changes on the slides

Q4 '25 · further in the deck

“Incoming CRO”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2025 · p. 3 ·

Leadership changes on the slides

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“Chief Product and Marketing Officer”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 8 ·

Leadership changes on the slides

Q4 '26 · further in the deck

“Jessica Ross”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 18 ·

GitLab Duo, then the Duo Agent Platform

Q3 '25 · further in the deck

“AI-assisted workflows for everyone in the software development lifecycle”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2025 · p. 7 ·

GitLab Duo, then the Duo Agent Platform

Q4 '25 · further in the deck

“Continue to drive agentic AI innovation, including Duo Workflow”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2025 · p. 16 ·

GitLab Duo, then the Duo Agent Platform

Q1 '26 · further in the deck

“The GitLab Duo Product Suite”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, First Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 9 ·

GitLab Duo, then the Duo Agent Platform

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“Platform is more than code generation”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 25 ·

GitLab Duo, then the Duo Agent Platform

Q3 '26 · further in the deck

“Enabling AI automation across the software lifecycle”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 17 ·

GitLab Duo, then the Duo Agent Platform

Q4 '26 · further in the deck

“Agentic control plane”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 10 ·

GitLab Duo, then the Duo Agent Platform

Q1 '27 · further in the deck

“GitLab Duo Agent Platform in Q1 FY27 out of”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, First Quarter and Fiscal Year 2027 · p. 5 ·

GitLab Duo, then the Duo Agent Platform

Q2 '27 · further in the deck

“Adoption broadening”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter and Fiscal Year 2027 · p. 4 ·

GitLab Ultimate share of ARR

Q1 '26 · further in the deck

“Market leading, AI-native enterprise-grade DevSecOps solution 52% of total ARR from GitLab”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, First Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 17 ·

GitLab Ultimate share of ARR

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“DevSecOps solution 53% of total ARR1 from GitLab”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 11 ·

GitLab Ultimate share of ARR

Q3 '26 · further in the deck

“DevSecOps solution 54% of total ARR1 from GitLab”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 7 ·

GitLab Ultimate share of ARR

Q4 '26 · further in the deck

“56% of total ARR1 from GitLab”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 13 ·

GitLab Ultimate share of ARR

Q1 '27 · further in the deck

“DevSecOps solution 57% 7 10 of total ARR1 from GitLab”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, First Quarter and Fiscal Year 2027 · p. 4 ·

GitLab Ultimate share of ARR

Q2 '27 · further in the deck

“Security, governance, and compliance are driving demand as AI proliferates across the SDLC 59% 8 10 of total ARR1 from Ultimate largest Q2 deals purchased Ultimate 1 Definitions can be found in the Appendix out of 35%”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter and Fiscal Year 2027 · p. 6 ·

The plan - three FY26 objectives, then five growth initiatives

Q4 '25 · further in the deck

“FY26 Plan”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2025 · p. 9 ·

The plan - three FY26 objectives, then five growth initiatives

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“FY26 Plan update”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 4 ·

The plan - three FY26 objectives, then five growth initiatives

Q3 '26 · further in the deck

“FY26 Plan update”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 10 ·

The plan - three FY26 objectives, then five growth initiatives

Q4 '26 · further in the deck

“Reaccelerating first orders”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 4 ·

The plan - three FY26 objectives, then five growth initiatives

Q1 '27 · further in the deck

“Five growth initiatives 01 Accelerating first orders • 30% new logo growth YoY”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, First Quarter and Fiscal Year 2027 · p. 7 ·

The plan - three FY26 objectives, then five growth initiatives

Q2 '27 · further in the deck

“Progress across five growth initiatives 01 Accelerating First Orders”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter and Fiscal Year 2027 · p. 4 ·

New customers and first orders

Q4 '25 · further in the deck

“New customer acquisition9,893 customers of $5,000 or more in ARR1 123 customers of $1M or more in ARR1 1,229 customers of $100,000 or more in ARR1 1 Definitions and reconciliations with most directly comparable GAAP figure can be found in the Appendix.”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2025 · p. 11 ·

New customers and first orders

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“Global new business team focusing on sales-led first order lands, a post-sales motion to support rapid module adoption, and value realization”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 5 ·

New customers and first orders

Q4 '26 · further in the deck

“Reversed deceleration”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 5 ·

New customers and first orders

Q1 '27 · further in the deck

“Five growth initiatives 01 Accelerating first orders • 30% new logo growth YoY”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, First Quarter and Fiscal Year 2027 · p. 7 ·

New customers and first orders

Q2 '27 · headline page

“Largest First Order quarter in three years”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter and Fiscal Year 2027 · p. 3 ·

Consumption pricing and Flex

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“Seat-based for core platform + usage-based for Al capabilities”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 24 ·

Consumption pricing and Flex

Q4 '26 · further in the deck

“DAP Credits included”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 9 ·

Consumption pricing and Flex

Q1 '27 · further in the deck

“GitLab Flex: A more flexible pricing model”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, First Quarter and Fiscal Year 2027 · p. 11 ·

Consumption pricing and Flex

Q2 '27 · further in the deck

“Flex launched; consumption scaling”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter and Fiscal Year 2027 · p. 4 ·

AI makes customers use more GitLab

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“We expect AI to reinforce the value of GitLab”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 23 ·

AI makes customers use more GitLab

Q1 '27 · further in the deck

“Platform activity is surging”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, First Quarter and Fiscal Year 2027 · p. 6 ·

AI makes customers use more GitLab

Q2 '27 · further in the deck

“As enterprises adopt more AI development tools, they use more GitLab”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter and Fiscal Year 2027 · p. 5 ·

Security and platform consolidation

Q3 '25 · further in the deck

“Shifting security left to embed it earlier in the development process”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2025 · p. 16 ·

Security and platform consolidation

Q4 '25 · further in the deck

“Criticality of security”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2025 · p. 6 ·

Security and platform consolidation

Q1 '26 · further in the deck

“Deepening security and compliance capabilities”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, First Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 8 ·

Security and platform consolidation

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“Utilizing security policies to shift left”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 18 ·

Security and platform consolidation

Q3 '26 · further in the deck

“Static Reachability Analysis to identify exploitable vulnerabilities”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 16 ·

Security and platform consolidation

Q4 '26 · further in the deck

“Compliance + vulnerability management”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2026 · p. 10 ·

Security and platform consolidation

Q2 '27 · further in the deck

“Security, governance, and compliance are driving demand as AI proliferates across the SDLC 59% 8 10 of total ARR1 from Ultimate largest Q2 deals purchased Ultimate 1 Definitions can be found in the Appendix out of 35%”

Deck GitLab Investor Presentation, Second Quarter and Fiscal Year 2027 · p. 6 ·

What they keep talking about · 10

The themes that show up deck after deck, and the ones that disappear.

Leadership
Four decks introduce a new face: the chief executive in Q3 FY25, an incoming revenue chief in Q4 FY25, a product-and-marketing chief in Q2 FY26, the chief financial officer in Q4 FY26.
Duo
In all eight. Duo add-ons lead the AI story to Q1 FY26; Duo Workflow becomes the Duo Agent Platform in Q2 FY26; the first deal count arrives in Q1 FY27 and the first revenue measure in Q2 FY27.
Ultimate
First shown Q1 FY26 at 52% of ARR, and up every quarter since to 59% — the one series that has never been interrupted.
The plan
Three objectives from Q4 FY25 to Q3 FY26, then five growth initiatives from Q4 FY26 that add pricing, price-sensitive customers and the AI strategy.
New customers
Counted as base customers to Q3 FY26, then spoken of as first orders instead, with a count (1,700) only in Q2 FY27 — where it leads the deck.
Flex
Hybrid seat-plus-usage pricing appears Q2 FY26, Flex is named in Q1 FY27, and Q2 FY27 gives it three slides of revenue-recognition detail and leaves it out of the guide.
AI usage
The answer to the seat-compression worry, in three decks: a customer survey in Q2 FY26, then push and pipeline growth from Q1 FY27.
Security
In seven of the eight, and the only theme carried without a number attached to it.
New
Q2 FY27: net ARR growth, calculated billings, gross retention, first orders and paid consumption run rate — five measures at once, in the quarter retention rose.
Quiet
Net retention left page one for Q4 FY26 and Q1 FY27 while it was falling, and came back at 117% when it rose. The customer counts and run-rate revenue did not come back.
Every quarterly report we’ve saved · 9

The press releases and shareholder letters behind this page.

Archived as text; the links open the copies filed on EDGAR or the investor-relations site.

What analysts asked them

8 calls · Q3 25 – Q2 27

The last eight earnings calls: what analysts kept asking about, which questions got dodged, and how much the CEO did the talking.

Share of questions by topic, call by call. A topic that suddenly dominates is usually the problem. The last row is how much of the answering the CEO did, rather than the CFO or others.

Share of questions about…Q3 25Q4 25Q1 26Q2 26Q3 26Q4 26Q1 27Q2 27
Demand & customers47%50%36%15%38%45%80%45%
Growth & sales47%40%43%46%31%64%30%45%
Pricing & margins20%10%21%·6%27%30%9%
Guidance & outlook20%30%14%31%19%45%30%18%
Capacity & supply·····9%··
Capital & financing·10%14%8%6%9%20%9%
Competition···8%··20%9%
Products & technology33%20%21%31%38%36%40%36%
Macro & regulation7%·14%8%12%·10%·
Other27%30%29%46%25%··18%
Questions1510141316111011
How much the CEO talked8%48%66%63%77%68%63%82%

Who’s in charge, who’s selling

read from the filings · 1 Oct 2026

Shareholder votes against the board and pay, plus which executives have been selling their own shares.

  1. Tier 2 · improving

    The dual class ended, and nobody had to negotiate for it

    Sijbrandij held 93.76% of the ten-vote Class B and 50.43% of the total vote as executive chair. Class B outstanding fell from 16.7M shares in January to 1.1M in July, and on 21 Aug '26 the remainder converted into ordinary stock one-for-one because the class had dropped below 5% of the shares. The 10-Q records it in one line: "Following the conversion, GitLab has a single class of common stock outstanding."

  2. Tier 2 · worsening

    Six senior seats changed in twenty-one months, three of them in finance

    Chief executive Dec '24, revenue May '25, chief financial officer out Sep '25 and in Jan '26 with an interim between, technology out Jan '26 and in Jan '26, legal out Jun '26, accounting out Sep '26. The board also cut itself from nine members to eight when a director left in April rather than replacing her. Nothing filed names a successor to the chief legal officer, and the chief financial officer — nine months into the job — is now her own principal accounting officer.

  3. Tier 2 · stable

    Stock pay at 98% of free cash flow, against a reserve that grows 5% a year by itself

    Share-based pay was $215.0M in FY26, 22.5% of revenue and 98% of adjusted free cash flow, so free cash flow after it is about nil; over five years it was $717M against $264M of operating cash before a one-off tax payment. The equity plan's reserve rises automatically every February by 5% of the shares — 8.5M this year — with 1% more for the purchase plan. The first buyback, $400M authorised in March 2026, spent $154.7M at an average $26.47 and has $245.3M left.

  4. Tier 2 · stable

    Eighty insider sales, three small buys, and only a third of it on a plan

    $127.6M sold by seven insiders in the year to Q2 '26 with 31.3% under pre-set plans — about 1.6% of market value, the heaviest in this cluster relative to size. The largest seller in the Form 4 parse is Matthew Jacobson, the ICONIQ partner who chairs the nominating committee and sits on the compensation committee, at about $39.1M with none of it recorded as planned; the founder sold about $23.7M, all on plans.

  5. Tier 3 · worsening

    Net retention left the headline slide for the two quarters it looked worst

    Dollar-based net retention was on page one at 124%, 123%, 122%, 121% and 119% from Q3 FY25 to Q3 FY26, vanished from the Q4 FY26 and Q1 FY27 decks — the quarter the chief executive told an analyst it "is not something that we guide to or focus on" — and returned in Q2 FY27 at 117%, billed as the first sequential rise since 2024. Three other measures stopped: the base-customer and $100k-ARR counts, the $1M-ARR count, and run-rate revenue with its two-year rate (32% down to 26%). Persistence across the eight decks is 0.625.

Where shareholders voted no

At each annual meeting shareholders vote on who sits on the board, what the executives are paid and whether the company may create more shares. These are the votes that drew the most "no"s at the last two meetings: the shares voted against (or withheld) each year, then what share of all votes cast that was. Under each one, what the vote was about and what a no means.

20252026Share 2026
Say on payExecutive pay. Shareholders say whether they accept what the top executives were paid. The vote is advisory: the board can ignore it, but a large no is a public rebuke and boards usually change the pay plan after one.48.1M against8.9M against3.6%
Ratify KPMGThe auditor. Keeping the outside accounting firm that checks the company's books. This almost always passes; a sizeable no means shareholders doubt the audit or think the firm has been in place too long.3.6M against4.3M against1.6%
Sullivan (lead independent)A board seat. Shareholders vote to keep this person on the board, the group that hires, pays and can fire the CEO. A no, or a withheld vote, says they want this director out, often because of the committee they sit on or a decision they signed off.—23.8M withheld9.7%
Blasing (Class II)A board seat.—1.6M withheld0.7%
Jacobson (nominating chair)A board seat.40.3M abstained—13.7%

Insiders who sold the most stock

Reported sales by executives and directors, biggest first.

SEC insider data sets, Jul '25-Jun '26SoldNote
All insiders$127.6M80 sales by 7 people against 3 small purchases
Matthew Jacobsonabout $39.1M~1.49M shares, the largest seller, none of it on a plan
Sytse Sijbrandijabout $23.7M~729K shares, all on 10b5-1 plans
Of all of it, pre-planned31.3%the lowest planned share of the four names among the companies covered here