The Ledger

TMCTMC the metals company Inc.

Industry Mining materials Updated 28 Sep 2026 Price 23 Oct 2026

If management hits its targets, one share by the end of 2028

$2.43 → $3.04

If management hits its targets

from IR material and Earnings Calls

What one share would be worth today and in 12, 24 and 36 months if the company does exactly what its management has promised, next to what a share costs now. Worked out from the targets management gave in its own results decks and earnings calls.

$2 → $2

One guided year on: +11% a year. 2027 is the year management has guided, and it is still running 12 months from the price date, so the 12-month bar, $2.43, stays at or near today's price: the model counts no growth until a guided year is over and only the share count moves. Carried one year past it on management's own figures, the same ones the 24- and 36-month bars use, a share works out to $3.04 at the end of 2028, 26 months from the price date. Climbing there at an even pace from today's $2.43 is +11% a year, $2.69 in 12 months, and that is the figure the Companies page lists.

Show the math

company value if delivered, less net debt, divided by the shares. Value is today's company value per tonne of nameplate capacity, held as capacity grows from the 3.0 Mt-a-year system due to start commissioning in Q4 '27 toward the 7–11 Mt a year their studies describe for 2031. No price, cost or margin is assumed, because management has given none. Each figure management gave as a range is taken at its middle. Up to the end of 2027, the year management has guided, the company's value is today's and only the share count moves, so the figure is held at today's price rather than shown falling with the dilution.

0$1$2$3$4Today (Oct 2026): $2, the market price$2TodayOct 202612 months (Oct 2027): $2 a share if management delivers; held at the earlier level, see the note$212 monthsOct 202724 months (Oct 2028): $3 a share if management delivers$324 monthsOct 202836 months (Oct 2029): $4 a share if management delivers$436 monthsOct 2029
SharesTodayIn 12 monthsOct 2027In 24 monthsOct 2028In 36 monthsOct 2029
Shares growing at their past pace+8.6% a year, Aug '25 to Aug '26, a year with no offering; no raise for the build is counted$2$2487M sh · held$3529M sh$4574M sh
Show the math, step by step

How we got there: company value if the plan is delivered, minus debt, divided by all the shares, including the new ones they’d have to sell to pay for it.

  1. Capacity. 3.0 Mt of wet nodules a year from the one system Allseas is building, commissioning to begin in Q4 '27 (Q2 '26 deck), and treated as in place from 2027. Then 1–2 Mt a year added: the low end is the Q2 '26 deck's undated scale-up from 3 to 7 Mt a year, dated to 2031; the high end is the pre-feasibility study's 11 Mt a year from 2031 (Q2 '25 deck).
  2. Today's value per tonne. Today's company value is spread over the 3.0 Mt and held per tonne as capacity grows. That is generous to the plan: today's price already pays for the permit, the studies and the resource beyond the first system.
  3. Shares. 441.1M at 11 Aug 2026, growing at the pace of the year to August 2026, which held no offering. Unvested RSUs, options and warrants are left out, and so is any raise for the build, which the company says it needs and is seeking.
  4. Held. To the end of 2027, the year management has guided, the company's value is today's and only the share count moves, so the figure in October 2027 is held at today's price, $2; the arithmetic alone gives $2.
  5. Arithmetic. (company value − net debt) ÷ shares. Net debt today is $46M: the $145.0M royalty liability TMC carries as debt, less $98.7M of cash. The build is not charged.

Promises vs. what happened

15 claims · 8 decks

Every target management put in a slide deck, and whether they hit it, missed it, or quietly dropped it.

Dates slip; the money comes from somewhere else. Two of eleven settled promises held. The permit and first-production dates are still open, and both have been reworded.

PromiseMade inWhat happened
PAMCO trial done early '25Q3 '24Feb '25Held
No raise in the near term (Nov '25)Q3 '25none sinceHeld
Study before the June '25 filingQ4 '244 Aug '25Late
New shelf and ATM by end '25Q2 '25shelf Mar '26; no ATMLate
NOAA rule around Dec '25Q3 '2521 Jan '26Late
Allseas deal 'in the coming days'Q4 '2545 days; cost split changedLate
Mariana feasibility agreementQ4 '25work began, no agreementLate
Cash use under $5M a quarterQ3 '24$9–20M a quarterDropped
$37M raise funds it to the permitQ1 '25Korea Zinc added $85M; no permitOpen
Permit by Q1 '27Q4 '25'a few months' late, no quarterOpen
First production Q4 '27Q2 '25now 'commissioning to begin'Open
US government support in 2026Q4 '25talks, no awardOpen
NORI's ISA application, 27 Jun '25Q3 '24filed with NOAA insteadMissed
ISA Mining Code in 2025Q3 '24no target dateMissed
Brownsville land 'in the near future'Q4 '25no leaseMissed

What they’re pitching

the headline page, deck by deck

The headline from each quarterly results deck over two years, so you can see what they want you to focus on, and when it changes.

Q3
'24
Q4
'24
Q1
'25
Q2
'25
Q3
'25
Q4
'25
Q1
'26
Q2
'26

NOAA permitPage one since Q4 '25

ISAFirst seen Q3 '24

LiquidityOff page one Q4 '25

Study NPVOff page one Q1 '26

Peer valueFirst seen Q3 '24

EnvironmentFirst seen Q3 '24

US policyFirst seen Q3 '24

ProcessingFirst seen Q3 '24

AllseasFirst seen Q2 '25

on the headline page further in the deck not in the deck▲ onto page one▼ off page one● first mentionTap a mark for the quote.

U.S. permitting through NOAA (DSHMRA)

Q4 '24 · headline page

“Another path forward has emerged, and we are going to take it.”

Deck TMC Fourth Quarter 2024 Corporate Update · p. 7 ·

U.S. permitting through NOAA (DSHMRA)

Q1 '25 · further in the deck

“TMC USA has filed the world’s first commercial recovery permit application and two exploration license applications under existing U.S. seabed mining code.”

Deck TMC First Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 5 ·

U.S. permitting through NOAA (DSHMRA)

Q2 '25 · further in the deck

“We are systematically moving through an enforceable and transparent U.S.”

Deck TMC Second Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 9 ·

U.S. permitting through NOAA (DSHMRA)

Q3 '25 · further in the deck

“We are systematically moving through an enforceable and transparent U.S.”

Deck TMC Third Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 9 ·

U.S. permitting through NOAA (DSHMRA)

Q4 '25 · headline page

“❑ Commercial Recovery Permit grant in less than one year from today with regular public updates on milestones including full compliance, certification, EIS”

Deck TMC Fourth Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 4 ·

U.S. permitting through NOAA (DSHMRA)

Q1 '26 · headline page

“Consolidated application: the path to permit is clear, with EL/CRP grant expected in Q1 2027.”

Deck TMC First Quarter 2026 Corporate Update · p. 4 ·

U.S. permitting through NOAA (DSHMRA)

Q2 '26 · headline page

“U.S. permitting: NOAA is making steady progress. There have been administrative delays of a few months, but CRP still expected well in advance of vessel commissioning.”

Deck TMC Second Quarter 2026 Corporate Update · p. 4 ·

ISA application and ISA gridlock

Q3 '24 · further in the deck

“‒ NORI has set the date of June 27, 2025 for its expected submission of the Application to the ISA, after discussions with Nauru”

Deck TMC Third Quarter 2024 Corporate Update · p. 6 ·

ISA application and ISA gridlock

Q4 '24 · further in the deck

“Mining Code, and no agreement on NORI application review process.”

Deck TMC Fourth Quarter 2024 Corporate Update · p. 10 ·

ISA application and ISA gridlock

Q3 '25 · further in the deck

““Since 2019, the ISA Council has missed two self -imposed deadlines to complete its work on the regulations…””

Deck TMC Third Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 11 ·

ISA application and ISA gridlock

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“‐ In a further sign of the Authority’s inertia, the Council agreed to devise a roadmap towards a roadmap for the adoption of the Mining Code”

Deck TMC Second Quarter 2026 Corporate Update · p. 19 ·

Liquidity and funding

Q3 '24 · headline page

“TMC liquidity (cash plus borrowing capacity) of ~$49 million at”

Deck TMC Third Quarter 2024 Corporate Update · p. 4 ·

Liquidity and funding

Q4 '24 · further in the deck

“TMC liquidity (cash plus borrowing capacity) of $62 million at Dec.”

Deck TMC Fourth Quarter 2024 Corporate Update · p. 33 ·

Liquidity and funding

Q1 '25 · headline page

“Direct Offering funds us beyond potential grant of commercial recovery permit.”

Deck TMC First Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 3 ·

Liquidity and funding

Q2 '25 · further in the deck

“TMC liquidity (pro forma cash plus borrowing capacity) of $165 million at June 30, 2025.”

Deck TMC Second Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 23 ·

Liquidity and funding

Q3 '25 · headline page

“TMC has liquidity of $165M as of November 13 excluding in-the-money warrants, with no need to tap the public markets in the near term.”

Deck TMC Third Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 4 ·

Liquidity and funding

Q4 '25 · further in the deck

“TMC had liquidity of $162M as of December 31 excluding in -the-money warrants, with no need to tap the public markets in the near term.”

Deck TMC Fourth Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 18 ·

Liquidity and funding

Q1 '26 · further in the deck

“TMC had liquidity of $164M (cash plus borrowing capacity) as of March 31, 2026.”

Deck TMC First Quarter 2026 Corporate Update · p. 19 ·

Liquidity and funding

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“was $143 million at June 30, 2026.”

Deck TMC Second Quarter 2026 Corporate Update · p. 25 ·

PFS and IA project economics

Q3 '24 · further in the deck

“We have now completed the PFS for the NORI-D Project.”

Deck TMC Third Quarter 2024 Corporate Update · p. 12 ·

PFS and IA project economics

Q2 '25 · headline page

“Two new economic reports show the value and commercial viability of these low-cost nodule projects.”

Deck TMC Second Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 4 ·

PFS and IA project economics

Q3 '25 · further in the deck

“Two new economic studies show the value and commercial viability of our projects.”

Deck TMC Third Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 18 ·

PFS and IA project economics

Q4 '25 · headline page

“✓ World-first PFS for nodule project + IA = $23.6B NPV”

Deck TMC Fourth Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 4 ·

PFS and IA project economics

Q1 '26 · further in the deck

“Project economics: Two studies cover total estimated 1.6 billion tonne resource, with combined NPV of $23.6 billion.”

Deck TMC First Quarter 2026 Corporate Update · p. 17 ·

PFS and IA project economics

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“Project economics: Two studies cover total estimated 1.6 billion tonne resource, with combined NPV of $23.6 billion.”

Deck TMC Second Quarter 2026 Corporate Update · p. 22 ·

Valuation against nickel peers

Q3 '24 · further in the deck

“And yet, TMC is valued at a fraction of other pre-production nickel developers, most of which are yet to be fully permitted.”

Deck TMC Third Quarter 2024 Corporate Update · p. 9 ·

Valuation against nickel peers

Q2 '25 · further in the deck

“Based on comparable companies, we believe we are still undervalued.”

Deck TMC Second Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 22 ·

Valuation against nickel peers

Q3 '25 · further in the deck

“Based on comparable companies, we believe we are still undervalued.”

Deck TMC Third Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 22 ·

Valuation against nickel peers

Q4 '25 · further in the deck

“Based on comparable companies, we believe we are still undervalued.”

Deck TMC Fourth Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 17 ·

Valuation against nickel peers

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“We believe TMC is undervalued at 8% of SEC -compliant”

Deck TMC Second Quarter 2026 Corporate Update · p. 24 ·

Environmental impact evidence

Q3 '24 · further in the deck

“Our EIS is focusing on addressing six primary concerns. Preliminary results are encouraging on every one of them.”

Deck TMC Third Quarter 2024 Corporate Update · p. 17 ·

Environmental impact evidence

Q4 '24 · further in the deck

“Our EIS is addressing six primary concerns. Results are encouraging on every one of them.”

Deck TMC Fourth Quarter 2024 Corporate Update · p. 25 ·

Environmental impact evidence

Q1 '25 · further in the deck

“Our EIS is addressing six primary concerns. Results are encouraging on every one of them.”

Deck TMC First Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 19 ·

Environmental impact evidence

Q4 '25 · further in the deck

“After a decade of environmental research, the results are in —and with our EIA complete, we’ve begun sharing key takeaways in new video series.”

Deck TMC Fourth Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 14 ·

U.S. critical-minerals policy

Q3 '24 · further in the deck

“With the U.S. election now over and Republicans controlling the White House and Congress, multiple pending actions are set to accelerate in 2025.”

Deck TMC Third Quarter 2024 Corporate Update · p. 14 ·

U.S. critical-minerals policy

Q1 '25 · further in the deck

“Order of April 24, 2025, calls for America’s return to leadership in the offshore minerals industry.”

Deck TMC First Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 7 ·

U.S. critical-minerals policy

Q3 '25 · further in the deck

“The problem: today, America depends entirely on imports for primary Ni, Mn and Co.”

Deck TMC Third Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 5 ·

U.S. critical-minerals policy

Q4 '25 · further in the deck

“‐ On March 13, 2026, TMC joined the Defense Industrial”

Deck TMC Fourth Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 10 ·

U.S. critical-minerals policy

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“‐ On August 7, 2026, President Trump convened a roundtable at the U.S. Department of State with 200+ mining executives, educators and investors, announcing ~$3 billion of new critical minerals and battery investment — and also expressly discussed recovery of polymetallic nodules from the deep seabed”

Deck TMC Second Quarter 2026 Corporate Update · p. 17 ·

Onshore processing, from PAMCO tolling to a U.S. site

Q3 '24 · further in the deck

“The world’s first commercial-scale nodule processing trial is underway at PAMCO’s facility in Japan.”

Deck TMC Third Quarter 2024 Corporate Update · p. 13 ·

Onshore processing, from PAMCO tolling to a U.S. site

Q1 '25 · further in the deck

“᠆ By utilizing PAMCO’s existing facility, TMC can eliminate the need for upfront onshore capital expenditures as part of its capital-light approach”

Deck TMC First Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 17 ·

Onshore processing, from PAMCO tolling to a U.S. site

Q2 '25 · further in the deck

“RKEF plants (PAMCO/Japan, Indonesia)”

Deck TMC Second Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 14 ·

Onshore processing, from PAMCO tolling to a U.S. site

Q4 '25 · further in the deck

“For the U.S. to establish a domestic processing ecosystem for nodules, it first requires a site -specific feasibility study. TMC USA is progressing this work in Brownsville, Texas.”

Deck TMC Fourth Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 7 ·

Onshore processing, from PAMCO tolling to a U.S. site

Q1 '26 · further in the deck

“Onshore: Site-specific feasibility studies are a prerequisite for any”

Deck TMC First Quarter 2026 Corporate Update · p. 14 ·

Onshore processing, from PAMCO tolling to a U.S. site

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“Nodules to be shipped to the USA for processing via the Panama Canal.”

Deck TMC Second Quarter 2026 Corporate Update · p. 12 ·

Allseas offshore production system

Q2 '25 · further in the deck

“TMC payback to Allseas once in production”

Deck TMC Second Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 4 ·

Allseas offshore production system

Q4 '25 · further in the deck

“Development of offshore production system moving ahead, with commissioning targeted for Q4 2027.”

Deck TMC Fourth Quarter 2025 Corporate Update · p. 6 ·

Allseas offshore production system

Q1 '26 · further in the deck

“Allseas to complete development and operate first commercial offshore system.”

Deck TMC First Quarter 2026 Corporate Update · p. 6 ·

Allseas offshore production system

Q2 '26 · further in the deck

“‐ System commissioning expected to begin in Q4 2027 9”

Deck TMC Second Quarter 2026 Corporate Update · p. 9 ·

What they keep talking about · 9

The themes that show up deck after deck, and the ones that disappear.

NOAA permit
First in the March '25 deck ('another path forward'), the opening slide from Q4 '25. The grant date went from under a year (Mar '26) to Q1 '27 (May '26) to 'administrative delays of a few months' and no quarter (Aug '26).
ISA
The plan of record in Nov '24, with a June '25 filing date; from March '25 only the slow alternative, down to the Council's 'roadmap towards a roadmap' (Aug '26).
Liquidity
On every deck: ~$49M (Sep '24) to $165M (Nov '25) on Korea Zinc and the May '25 raise, then $143M (Jun '26). On the opening slide until Q3 '25, at the back since.
Study NPV
$23.6B of combined NPV on every deck since Aug '25, unchanged; 'combined NPV today' became 'combined NPV' in 2026.
Peer value
'We believe we are still undervalued' against nickel developers, on five decks; the peer source switched from Cantor Fitzgerald to 'consensus estimates' in Q2 '26.
Processing
Capital-light tolling at PAMCO in Japan (2024–25) became a Brownsville, Texas site from Q4 '25, contingent on US government support.
Allseas
Production 'Q4 2027' from Aug '25; the long-form deal signed May '26, with Allseas now funding 'a significant portion' recoverable from production.
New
Q2 '26: dated permitting steps (August and October '26 estimates) and a scale-up from 3 to 7 Mt a year.
Quiet
The six-concern environmental slide ran to Q1 '25; the equity-raised table last appeared in Q2 '25; ATM and shelf capacity stopped being charted after Q1 '25.
Every quarterly report we’ve saved · 8

The press releases and shareholder letters behind this page.

Archived as text; the links open the copies filed on EDGAR or the investor-relations site.

What analysts asked them

8 calls · Q3 24 – Q2 26

The last eight earnings calls: what analysts kept asking about, which questions got dodged, and how much the CEO did the talking.

Share of questions by topic, call by call. A topic that suddenly dominates is usually the problem. The last row is how much of the answering the CEO did, rather than the CFO or others.

Share of questions about…Q3 24Q4 24Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25Q4 25Q1 26Q2 26
Demand & customers12%17%20%10%···8%
Growth & sales12%8%10%·····
Pricing & margins12%·····50%8%
Guidance & outlook·17%·10%····
Capacity & supply12%·10%10%·29%··
Capital & financing··10%20%···15%
Products & technology12%·10%30%··50%15%
Macro & regulation25%17%20%30%25%··15%
Other62%50%60%20%75%71%50%54%
Questions812101047213
How much the CEO talked37%57%56%52%64%57%64%71%

Who’s in charge, who’s selling

read from the filings · 7 Oct 2026

Shareholder votes against the board and pay, plus which executives have been selling their own shares.

  1. Tier 1 · live

    The build is not funded, and the next money is new shares

    Cash $98.7M at June '26, and the 10-Q says the company needs and is seeking more. Ready to use: an automatic shelf (Mar '26), a share plan raised by 40M shares in 2025 plus 4% each year, 52M awards and about 31M warrants outstanding. Shares are up 2.5 times since 2020.

  2. Tier 2 · stable

    The CEO and a director's fund are the standby lenders, for a fee

    A $44M line from Barron and ERAS (Karkar's family fund, 14.8%), undrawn, charging 6.5% a year on the undrawn amount: $3.2M paid to the two in 2025. Karkar chairs the compensation committee and counts as independent.

  3. Tier 2 · stable

    Chair and CEO in one, and three directors who are paid advisers

    Jurvetson, Hess and Spiro are paid in options and RSUs under consulting agreements; Hess may put up to $25M into the next raise. Six of the ten directors are independent.

  4. Tier 2 · stable

    Pay rides on price hurdles, and the officers sell

    The CEO's 20M RSUs vest at $7.50, $10 and $12.50; compensation actually paid was $99.8M in 2025. Officers and a director sold $14.9M from Jul '25 to Sep '26, none under a pre-set plan; nobody bought.

  5. Tier 3 · resolved

    A restatement over the royalty, fixed

    In Mar '24 the 2023 quarterly reports were declared unreliable: the NORI royalty had been booked as a sale, not as debt. The weakness was reported remediated in 2025; the controls have never been audited.

Where shareholders voted no

At each annual meeting shareholders vote on who sits on the board, what the executives are paid and whether the company may create more shares. These are the votes that drew the most "no"s at the last two meetings: the shares voted against (or withheld) each year, then what share of all votes cast that was. Under each one, what the vote was about and what a no means.

20252026Share 2026
Share plan +40M (Aug '25 meeting)Stock to pay staff and executives. Lets the company create new shares to hand out as pay. Every new share makes each existing share a slightly smaller slice of the company, so a no says shareholders think the dilution is too much.10.8M——
Pay (advisory)Executive pay. Shareholders say whether they accept what the top executives were paid. The vote is advisory: the board can ignore it, but a large no is a public rebuke and boards usually change the pay plan after one.—3.2M1.5%
Khama (audit)A board seat. Shareholders vote to keep this person on the board, the group that hires, pays and can fire the CEO. A no, or a withheld vote, says they want this director out, often because of the committee they sit on or a decision they signed off.4.7M0.8M0.4%
Madsbjerg (nominating chair)A board seat.4.2M1.5M0.7%
Hall (audit chair)A board seat.4.2M0.7M0.3%
Spiro (paid adviser)A board seat.—1.5M0.7%
Karkar (pay chair, lender)A board seat.0.3M0.9M0.4%

Insiders who sold the most stock

Reported sales by executives and directors, biggest first.

Form 4s, Jul 2025–Sep 2026SoldNote
Ilves, chief strategy officer$9.2M22 Sep '25, no plan; her retention grant came the next day
O'Sullivan, chief development officer$4.0MMay–Dec '25; three sales reported late
Shesky, CFO$1.6MMar '26, sell-to-cover for taxes
May, director$0.1MJun '26, sell-to-cover; left the board Sep '26